Dec 9, 2020 • 46M

Kevin McKernan on the review of the Corman-Drosten PCR methodology that he co-authored–and some words of appreciation for my listeners!

 
1×
0:00
-46:09
Open in playerListen on);
    Substack App
    Download MP3
    Get a private RSS link for listening
    Subscribe to What Then Must We Do? to get a private link for listening in your favorite podcast player. Learn about RSS.

Appears in this episode

Bretigne
Is there any hope at all of building and maintaining a free society? If so, how? If you are among "the remnant", this might be the show for you.
Episode details
Comments

I speak with Kevin McKernan about the report he co-authored calling for the retraction of the paper upon which much of the world's Covid-19 PCR testing is based. Kevin also thanks you guys–my listeners–for possibly helping to get the attention of some of those who are starting to reverse course on the lockdowns (and the badly flawed testing they are based on). So keep it up!

The Corman-Drosten Review Report (with comments) is here.

"Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR", by Corman, Drosten, et al, is here.

The five other papers that Kevin mentions are:

Jung, et al.

Gand, et al. (Download.)

Etievant, et al.

Muenchhoff, et al.

Konrad, et al.

Kevin's company, Medicinal Genomics, is here.

And you can find Kevin on Twitter, here.





Share