12 Comments

The dam holding back Peace, Truth, Freedom, Hope and Abundance has finally broken through. Mark this date down. It has been a long time coming. For many decades the Lyin' Loony Luciferian Leftists (including nearly everyone and everything in Washington D.C.) has increasingly and exponentially brainwashed and used predatorial aggression to lie, cheat, steal, maim, kill, kidnap, counterfeit, rob, and defy every Rule of Law set forth in the Constitution. Guess what? It was all kayfabe. For those who don't know the world is one giant professional wrestling match. Nothing is real. It's all fake and fraud (definition of 'kayfabe').

Most of Boobus Americanus lives in cognitive dissonance. Some have character, morals, and values. They know something is wrong. But they won't do anything about the increasing "Wokeism" we see everywhere with fat pink-haired slobs and clueless goobers slip-sliding their way through life. As Dean Wormer told Flounder in "Animal House" fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son.

I hoped but never thought I would see the solution to this unjust, broken world come to fruition. But here we are now with a solution. Warning: there will be bad times ahead. Some will survive, but many will fail, not because there was no hope. It is because just like a stock trade there will be winners and losers. Everyone has a choice.

So what is the solution? Simple as it sounds, the only possible solution is already happening. There are over 160 fake fiat worthless Ponzi scheme forms of money in the world today. Only one is sound, perfect, and decentralized, secure, and scalable for all the world. Bitcoin will fix the broken money and the broken world by bringing Peace, Truth, Freedom, Hope, and Abundance for all. Learn it. Study it. Live it. Everyone has a choice. Here is the link that you may need to play over and over in order to understand. Michael Saylor is a wise man. He said today that soon we will all be saying "I didn't buy enough Bitcoin." You'll find the link on X.

https://x.com/saylor/status/1847012566331281476

Expand full comment

Bitcoin is actually not a solution at all. It's effectively a Ponzi scheme. People have lost their shirts already. And it is only as secure as your internet connection and hackable computers. It's a fiction. What you "own" is a fiction. Well intentioned. But it is a mirage. I can see only one way, and that is to return to the gold standard (or something comparable). Maybe there isn't enough gold in the world, so maybe choose something else. But something we all agree is of sufficient intrinsic value to back our money. Another thing people don't understand about our money is that effectively, federal reserve notes are barter certificates. And they work well because nearly everyone will use them for barter. They have legitimacy because they work. I would look closely at other possible solutions, like ending the fed, breaking up the huge banks. I don't have an opinion on that. I just know that Bitcoin won't work, and why federal reserve notes do, even though they are not backed by anything and inflation occurs. Returning to more of a market-based system would help tremendously. But there must always be a balance resulting from pitting one strong entity (government) against another (cartels). A totally free market would be just as oppressive as our government is, because they would control what the consumer can buy. You would be forced to deal with them just to live.

Oh, and one more thing. I don't know if Bitcoin does this, but some cryptocurrencies do. They HACK people's web sites to STEAL their servers to "mine" currency. And the process of "mining" is a huge drain on our energy infrastructure. I had my own web sites replaced with cryptocurrency stuff numerous times until the fellow who runs my servers took action to cut off certain access.

Expand full comment

"A totally free market would be just as oppressive as our government is, because they would control what the consumer can buy." -- Oh dear lord. To quote JD Vance, "Do you hear yourself?"

Also, where on Earth are you getting your info about Bitcoin?

Expand full comment

I don't know what you are asking me about JD Vance. What is it that bothers you? As for Bitcoin, I get information from different sources. As for someone losing their money, I knew a woman who was a real enthusiast for Bitcoin, and she later reported that she lost all the money she had invested. As for the lack of security, this is just common sense. Any time your wealth depends totally on a bit of information in an UNKNOWN computer who knows where, you don't have it. It's a fiction. You may or may not be able to get it out. There is even a risk of this with any bank, but not nearly as great. People who don't trust these electronic records keep physical gold in their homes or other secure location (to the extent any location is secure). Even that is problematic because you cannot eat gold. With Bitcoin, you are trusting in the integrity of strangers who have no checks and balances on their activity. Now you are free to disagree, but I am also free to express my thoughts.

Expand full comment

Soooo...anyone want to lay any money down on which side will look like West Germany and which side will look like East Germany?

Expand full comment

Agreed. Tom Woods is also a proponent: https://tomwoods.com/ep-2188-is-national-divorce-anti-liberty/

IMHO, the Anti-Federalists had it right.

Expand full comment

One of the tactics used by progressive statists to successfully undermine the founders' republic is asking, no, demanding more than they think they can really get, then settling for something less that nonetheless "advances the ball". It's long past time that Americans learn to do the same thing.

It may, however, be too late. I fear we're at level two of Churchill's famous admonition.

“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”

“We’ve” created a nexus of incredible power over the past one hundred and ten years; accordingly Washington attracts narcissistic sociopaths and psychopaths from here and all over the world. They’ll be incredibly difficult to dislodge peacefully. Many don’t know how to do anything else, and will resist like wounded badgers in a thicket. Many won’t agree to do anything else, ever.

Expand full comment

National divorce? It's really not that simple. We aren't a nation in which the states are clearly either conservative or liberal. The vote demonstrates that almost every state is more or less evenly divided in its population. If there is a divorce, nearly half the population will be stranded in a state where they will experience extreme hardship in some way. And we will no longer have the strength to protect ourselves from our common enemies, like countries that want to enslave us. It's just an easy, neat solution that is dead wrong. I firmly believe that the major problem is lies and deceit. When some people who run for office and some media simply lie through their teeth continually, and some people believe them, they will vote for what they really don't believe in deep down inside. We have to stop voting for the pretty face or the soft-spoken voice. We need to teach the people responsibility for their lives and votes. We need to stop letting government and the media brainwash people. Above all, we need to pray. Which is what I have been doing. God can heal our land. But we need to stop shedding innocent blood and stop plundering each other. What will happen to those trapped in the fraction of the US? Most are not in a position to move. The upheaval will be phenomenal. It won't be peaceful. I don't see a way for that. Let us talk instead about how we can heal our land, return to the protection of our God-given human rights, and help our fellow citizens to thrive.

Expand full comment

if you fall for obvious globalist tricks . . . you are hopeless.

Just look at the hidden finance behind Lincoln war. The Crown always looming waiting to take back the colonies . . . Those are more productive conversations.

Expand full comment

Reorganization as a possibility must be acknowledged.

That said, I wonder sometimes if those who advocate "national divorce" have really considered all the implications.

Perhaps it is different in others' orbits, but in mine, it is glaringly apparent that there is no neat dividing line by which such a split can occur. We benefit from cooperation with others across a whole range of political views. We work with people, play with people, and can socialize with people who do not see everything the same way. I have had meaningful interactions for which I am grateful with people who could be categorized in all sorts of drastically different ways.

Perhaps it will inevitably be necessary, and if enough people want it, it will happen. But breaking up a society with so much geographical mobility and cultural interconnectedness will also have results similar to economic protectionism - aspects of cooperation, perhaps initially unseen, will break down and we will all be poorer for it, both economically and personally.

A US breakup won't be like breaking up a national conglomorate of regions with different long residing ethnic groups. It will be trying to slice up regions where people may presently own property across boundaries and families and friends live across boundaries, and businesses operate across boundaries, and your favorite recreation spots are across boundaries, and places that are special to you - maybe a gravestone of a beloved family member or a beach you loved as a kid, are now across boundaries.

I have long recognized the importance of the right to secession. And I truly hope for all of us that we find a better way to work out our differences.

Expand full comment

It's already broken up, there's 50 states and 10,000 counties. The federal government would have to shift out of DC and across the continent, which is probably the next step. Still stuck in the 19th century.

Expand full comment

Sure, but:

We still pay federal income tax;

We are still subject to federal agencies;

Most states eat at the federal trough, and come under federal control in many ways because of that.

We need to break up more.

Expand full comment